The Pros and Cons of Litigation
In this month’s blog installment, we’ll discuss some of the pros and cons of proceeding with litigation. In order to assess the financial viability of a process, it is important to understand the benefits and drawbacks of the process that is being assessed. Sometimes, even though more costly, litigation may be the best value for money, for instance, when there is value in adjudicating a dispute in a public forum. Accordingly, we hope that the pros and cons listed below will aid you in assessing if litigation is the right process for the resolution of your dispute.
Parties are compelled to comply with judgments
Due to the nature of the judicial system, judgments obtained through litigation compel parties to comply or they run the risk of being given certain penalties. These penalties can include the seizure and sale of property, garnishment of the monies owed, or even possible jail time. As such, the losing party in litigation is likely to comply with the judgment that is pronounced against it.
Right to appeal
Canada’s judicial system allows either party to a lawsuit to ask an appellate court for a review of the trial court’s decision should one of the parties disagree with it. This allows the opportunity for a previous decision to be overturned or for a new trial to be ordered and can be beneficial if you are unsatisfied with the trial court’s decision.
The principle of stare decisis in Canadian common law requires judges to follow the previous rulings of higher courts in their province and the Supreme Court of Canada on the same issue. As a result, cases brought to and decided in court are precedent setting, which can be helpful in discouraging similar suits from being launched against you in the future should the initial one fail.
Starting the litigation process will allow you to obtain information from the other side in the form of documents and verbal responses through processes called document discovery and examinations for discovery. These processes allow you to identify the strengths and weaknesses of both your own case as well as the opposing party’s case, and give you access to information that may not have been available through other forms of dispute resolution.
Potential for a predictable outcome
Taking a case to trial may yield a predictable outcome if there have been similar precedent-setting cases decided or if there is clear legislation that dictates the outcome. This can be beneficial if your case against a defendant is a strong one as it may give you more confidence in a positive outcome.
Longer time frame
Sometimes, depending on the complexity of the issues, cases can take up to several years to be decided by court. This means that both parties to a lawsuit may have to wait a significant amount of time until a judgment is pronounced, and the matter is concluded. Taking a case to trial is not ideal if the matter needs to be resolved quickly because the litigation process is inherently slower than other dispute resolution methods.
Judgment subject to appeal
Although the right to appeal was mentioned as a pro of litigation, it can also be a con. There is always the possibility that the decision in a case may be overturned by an appellate court, thus forcing the process to be redone all over again. This becomes a con when you receive a desirable outcome at trial, as this prolongs a final decision and also becomes more costly.
The litigation process can undoubtedly become quite costly with legal fees and other costs associated with going to trial. The costs of litigation will rise in accordance with the length of the pre-trial period as well as the length of the trial, meaning that the longer it takes to resolve the matter the higher the litigation costs.
One of the downsides of taking a case to trial is that it is almost always damaging to the relationship between the two parties. It can be difficult to overcome the animosity that can occur during the trial process and as a result, it can be very challenging for both parties to preserve any sort of relationship, be it professional or personal, once a judgment has been handed down.
A risk of taking a case to trial is the possibility that it will attract public attention as most court documents are available publicly. It may not be in your or your company’s best interest to take a case to court if you are uncomfortable with the matter being publicly accessible.
In the next installment, we will discuss the pros and cons of dispute resolution mechanisms other than litigation. This knowledge will aid you in deciding which process is best for the resolution of your dispute by taking all of the relevant factors into account, including the cost.